|
1 minute reading

It takes a long time for man to consider someone who does not resemble him as one of his fellow men

It takes a long time for man to consider someone who does not resemble him as one of his fellow men It takes a long time for man to consider someone who does not resemble him as one of his fellow men
Source : G liulian via Artstation (cropped)
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex
From a book
The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex
Font size
A
12 24 17
A
#perception of others

As man advances in civilisation, and small tribes are united into larger communities, the simplest reason would tell each individual that he ought to extend his social instincts and sympathies to all the members of the same nation, though personally unknown to him. This point being once reached, there is only an artificial barrier to prevent his sympathies extending to the men of all nations and races.

If, indeed, such men are separated from him by great differences in appearance or habits, experience unfortunately shews us how long it is, before we look at them as our fellow-creatures.

Sympathy beyond the confines of man, that is, humanity to the lower animals, seems to be one of the latest moral acquisitions. It is apparently unfelt by savages, except towards their pets. How little the old Romans knew of it is shewn by their abhorrent gladiatorial exhibitions. The very idea of humanity, as far as I could observe, was new to most of the Gauchos of the Pampas. This virtue, one of the noblest with which man is endowed, seems to arise incidentally from our sympathies becoming more tender and more widely diffused, until they are extended to all sentient beings.

As soon as this virtue is honoured and practised by some few men, it spreads through instruction and example to the young, and eventually becomes incorporated in public opinion.

Example

+ 15 points
Do you know an example, a fact, an evidence a personal experience which would support the theory ?


Please enter a value.

Interpretation

+ 15 points
Do you believe this entry can have a different reading, or that you can bring clarification to the text of the author ?


Please enter a value.

Comment

+ 5 points
Would you like to share an opinion on this
article ?


Please enter a value.
Similar articles
Category:
Anthropology
3 minutes reading

About 13.5 Billion years ago, matter, energy, time and space came into being in what is known as the Big ...

| Approved
Category:
Anthropology
1 minute reading

Humankind has colonised the future. We treat it like a distant colonial outpost devoid of people where we can freely ...

| Approved
Category:
Anthropology

As a kid, I read an article in the Scientific American. It measured the efficiency of locomotion of various species on the planet. Bears. Chimpanzees. Raccoons. Birds. Fish. How many kilo-calories per kilometer did they spend to move?

Humans were measured too.

And the condor won. It was the most efficient.

Humankind came in with an unimpressive showing about a third of the way down the list. But somebody there had the brilliance to test a human riding a bicycle. We blew away the condor. Off the charts.

This really had an impact on me. Humans are tool builders. We build tools that can dramatically amplify our innate human abilities. We ran an ad for this once that the personal computer is the bicycle of the mind. I believe that with every bone in my body.

| Approved
Category:
Anthropology
4 minutes reading

We are all special, which also means that none of us is. This is merely a numbers game. You have ...

| Approved
Category:
Anthropology
2 minutes reading

Genealogical ancestry, therefore, is surprising. It works much differently than genetic ancestry. [...] None of these surprises in genealogies, however, contradict ...

| Approved
Row:Column:
×
Row:Column:
×
Row:Column:
×