|
1 minute reading

[Mutual exclusivity] Any final choice you make will be at the expense of the profits/benefits that could have been generated by the excluded project

[Mutual exclusivity] Any final choice you make will be at the expense of the profits/benefits that could have been generated by the excluded project [Mutual exclusivity] Any final choice you make will be at the expense of the profits/benefits that could have been generated by the excluded project
Source : fuckyeahphysica via Tumblr
Font size
A
12 24 17
A
#Investment
#Mutual exclusivity
#Probability
#Project management
#Strategy

Mutual exclusivity is a statistical term describing at least two events that can not take place simultaneously.

It is used to describe a situation where the occurrence of one event is not influenced or caused by another. For example, the same person who owns a sum of money cannot simultaneously invest it in an investment fund and buy company shares. Another example:  the results of tossing coin run may result in "heads" or "tails", but not both. These results are collectively exhaustive, that is to say that one of the two must necessarily occur in order to eliminate the remaining possibility. However, any mutually exclusive event is not exhaustive because, in the case where one draws a six-sided dice, two opposing sides are mutually exclusive, but other results are possible on the four other faces.

Example (1)

+ 15 points
What are the mutual exclusivity example(s) you can think of ? Tossing coins is the most obvious one ! Any other ?


Please enter a value.
4

In the corporate world, the concept of mutual exclusivity is applied in capital budgeting. Firms often have to choose between a number of different projects in order to add value to the business. Some of these projects are mutually exclusive, like the sides of a coin, while others, like the faces of the dice, are independent. Here is a scenario:

A company has a budget of 50,000 euros to invest in new projects. Projects A and B cost 40,000 euros each and project C only costs 10,000: the company can combine A and C or B and C, but not A and B; A and B are mutually exclusive while C and A and C and B are independent.

Thus, faced with two mutually exclusive options, the company must consider the opportunity cost related to each of these projects because the final choice will be at the expense of the profits that could have generated the excluded project.

By ImTheoriqBeatme | 14/08/2020

Comment

+ 5 points
Would you like to share an opinion on this
article ?


Please enter a value.

Interpretation

+ 15 points
Do you believe this entry can have a different reading, or that you can bring clarification to the text of the author ?


Please enter a value.

Comment

+ 5 points
Would you like to share an opinion on this
article ?


Please enter a value.
Similar articles
Categories:
Business
Author unknown via Pinterest

Focus is saying no to 1,000 good ideas.

| Approved
Categories:
Business

Stay hungry.
Stay foolish.

| Approved
Category:
Business

Every time I read a management or self-help book, I find myself saying, “That’s fine, but that wasn’t really the hard thing about the situation.” The hard thing isn’t setting a big, hairy, audacious goal. The hard thing is laying people off when you miss the big goal. The hard thing isn’t hiring great people. The hard thing is when those “great people” develop a sense of entitlement and start demanding unreasonable things. The hard thing isn’t setting up an organizational chart. The hard thing is getting people to communicate within the organization that you just designed. The hard thing isn’t dreaming big. The hard thing is waking up in the middle of the night in a cold sweat when the dream turns into a nightmare.

| Approved
Categories:
Business

The last 10% is 90% of the work.

| Approved
Categories:
Business
2 minutes reading

Just before getting on the plane home we signed deals with two Chinese factories, and officially became the first American ...

| Approved
Row:Column:
×
Row:Column:
×
Row:Column:
×
Row:Column:
×