The fog model tells us motivation to perform and action, the ability to do it and a cue are the three elements that must converge for a target behavior to occur
Dr. BJ Fogg is the founder of the Persuasive Technology Laboratory at Stanford University. His research focuses on the use of technology to influence and modify the behavior of individuals.
According to him, three elements must converge at the same time for a target behavior to occur:
- Trigger (a cue)
Motivation is the underlying drives which motivates us. Three core motivators can influence the consumer: pleasure and pain (physical level) , hope and fear (emotional level), acceptance and social rejection (social level).
The ability includes six ways that can be seen as ability blockers – things that reduce one’s ability - but that can be changed, namely: time, money, mental and physical efforts, social deviance and non-routine.
Finally, the triggers may be external, such as a drill prompting action, or internal, as a routine behavior that would make you open the fridge every time you go to the kitchen. They are all the things that push you to perform an action, without which the behavior would just not occur.
The higher the motivation and the capacity, and the higher the effectiveness of a trigger, the higher the ods of the behavior taking place.
If the desired behavior is not occurring, then one of these three elements might be missing.
Source : BJ Fogg’s Behavior Model, behaviormodel.org, consulté le 22.08.2018
No matter what your product is, you are ultimately in the education business. Your customers need to be constantly educated about the many advantages of doing business with you, trained to use your products more effectively, and taught how to make never-ending improvement in their lives.
As customers, what we crave more than the commodity we think we are paying for is to be understood.
What we want more than a reliable ride to our destination, a comfortable bed for the night, or even a book we can get our teeth into, is to really be seen.
What we want more than responsive organizations is personal relevance.
The value isn't just in the data that businesses collect. What counts is how they use it to make our lives better.
I have great respect for anyone who can invent a clever name that suggests something about the brand. Some of my favorite coined names are Dreamery, Groupon, Pictionary, Cinnabon, Chillow, Pinterest, Chuggemaut, and San Franpsycho. (…) It's important to make sure your name is meaningful to potential customers, not just to you.
In the 1960s, sociologist William McPhee coined the notion of "double jeopardy", to describe people's sympathy and tendencies toward certain behaviors.
Its application to marketing is due to the statistician Andrew Ehrenberg who made the "double jeopardy" concept an empirical law according to which brands with lower market shares suffer from both low purchases and low brand loyalty.
In other words, less popular brands not only have fewer buyers, but also have fewer loyal customers compared to the dominant popular brands in the market. According to the concept of "double jeopardy", a dominant brand therefore has the highest percentage of purchase and a greater consumer loyalty to its brand. What is for the popular brand a double advantage, has a negative consequence for less popular brands: it is difficult for them to retain their customers and increase their sales because it is not easy to convince buyers that the quality of a product less sold, is of better quality than a brand recognized by all.