|
1 minute reading

[the luddite fallacy] New technology doesn’t destroy jobs – it only changes the composition of jobs in the economy

[the luddite fallacy] New technology doesn’t destroy jobs – it only changes the composition of jobs in the economy [the luddite fallacy] New technology doesn’t destroy jobs – it only changes the composition of jobs in the economy
Source: sparth via Artstation
The Lights in the Tunnel
From a book
The Lights in the Tunnel
Font size
A
12 24 17
A

Economists have invented a concept, named in honor of the 1811 Luddite movement, called the Luddite fallacy. This line of reasoning says that, while technological progress will cause some workers to lose their jobs as a result of outdated skills, any concern that advancing technology will lead to widespread, increasing unemployment is, in fact, a fallacy. In other words, machine automation will near lead to economy-wide, systemic unemployment.

The reasoning offered by economists is that, as automation increases the productivity of workers, it leads to lower prices for products and services, and in turn, those lower prices result in increased consumer demand. As businesses strive to meet that increased demand, they ramp up production—and that means new jobs.

Comments are small addendum used to provided quick feedback. They are intentionally limited in size and formatting.


Please enter a value.

Your example


Please enter a value.
Similar articles
Category:
Economy
[Conspicuous consumption] For individuals seeking superior distinction, wealth has to be displayed [Conspicuous consumption] For individuals seeking superior distinction, wealth has to be displayed
rebeccayanovska via Tumblr

In order to gain and to hold the esteem of men it is not sufficient merely to possess wealth or power. The wealth or power must be put in evidence, for esteem is awarded only on evidence. And not only does the evidence of wealth serve to impress one's importance on others and to keep their sense of importance alive and alert but it is scarcely less use in building up and preserving one's self-complacency.… Abstention from labor is the conventional evidence of wealth and is therefore the conventional mark of social standing; and this insistence on the meritoriousness of wealth leads to a more strenuous insistence on leisure.[...] According to well-established laws of human nature, prescription presently seizes upon this conventional evidence of wealth and fixes it in men's habits of thoughts as something that is itself substantially meritorious and ennobling.

| Approved
Category:
Economy
3 minutes reading

An economy is simply the sum of the transactions that make it up and a transaction is a very simple ...

| Approved
Category:
Economy
Market are the best allocation mechanism Market are the best allocation mechanism
Florian Aupetit via Artstation

It is not from the benevolence of the butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own self-interest. We address ourselves not to their humanity but to their self-love, and never talk to them of our own necessities, but of their advantages.

| Approved
Categories:
Economy
3 minutes reading

Coronavirus is a planetary event of a magnitude we have trouble wrapping our minds around, not only because of its ...

| Approved
Category:
Economy
1 minute reading

I've been thinking a lot lately about a piece I read in Stuart Brand's, CoEvolution Quarterly back in 1975. It's ...

| Approved
Row:Column:
×
Row:Column:
×